Jun
22
Kevin Kelly helped to launch Wired magazine back in 1993 and served as its executive editor until 1999. His blog gets a million visitors a month. The guy is super smart.
I’ve had the opportunity to be with him a couple times. This past May he and I served on a planning team for a nonprofit we’re both very fond of. In addition to talking about an article he had just submitted to Wired (see below), Kevin spent an hour talking to me about his forthcoming book. He says the book will make a moral case for why we need to create and use more technology, not less. That should be interesting!
His latest article in Wired makes another bold argument, this time about a “new socialism” of sorts. The rise of open source, crowd sourced social networks, “suggest a steady move toward a sort of socialism uniquely tuned for a networked world.”
We’re not talking about your grandfather’s socialism. In fact, there is a long list of past movements this new socialism is not. It is not class warfare. It is not anti-American; indeed, digital socialism may be the newest American innovation. While old-school socialism was an arm of the state, digital socialism is socialism without the state. This new brand of socialism currently operates in the realm of culture and economics, rather than government—for now.
Kelly continues…
Instead of gathering on collective farms, we gather in collective worlds. Instead of state factories, we have desktop factories connected to virtual co-ops. Instead of sharing drill bits, picks, and shovels, we share apps, scripts, and APIs. Instead of faceless politburos, we have faceless meritocracies, where the only thing that matters is getting things done. Instead of national production, we have peer production. Instead of government rations and subsidies, we have a bounty of free goods.
“We underestimate the power of our tools to reshape our minds,” he says. “Did we really believe we could collaboratively build and inhabit virtual worlds all day, every day, and not have it affect our perspective?”
Comments
One Response to “Kevin Kelly, New Socialism”
Leave a Reply
Hi Brad,
I think Socialism is the wrong term for it…
In most people it provokes such a negative response that they won’t get the point Kevin is making.
I think a more correct framework to analyze this phenomena is the free framework that Chris Anderson talks about in his article: “Free! Why $0.00 Is the Future of Business”.
Businesses are providing free, or collaborating to make money, not provide a social good. Likewise I would suggest most people blog to make money from ad words, even if this is not their primary motive.
I think that where people or communities are providing information or websites of value businesses buy those and use them to make money. This is how Google built a business model. They then further that model by giving away free software like android to control the customer interaction. Open source software such as linux still has a long way to go to take on Microsoft and Windows because it’s not very usable for your average mum and dad. Furthermore there is no incentive for the users of linux to develop a package that could be sold to new computer buyers. If linux did start becoming popular then what would stop a corporate cashing in on it?
This doesn’t sound like socialism to me, just a new way of undertaking good old fashioned capitalism.
Chris