<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kevin Kelly, New Socialism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bradabare.com/2009/06/kevin-kelly-new-socialism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bradabare.com/2009/06/kevin-kelly-new-socialism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:04:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Heaslip</title>
		<link>http://www.bradabare.com/2009/06/kevin-kelly-new-socialism/comment-page-1/#comment-8798</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Heaslip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bradabare.com/?p=1162#comment-8798</guid>
		<description>Hi Brad,

I think Socialism is the wrong term for it... 

In most people it provokes such a negative response that they won&#039;t get the point Kevin is making.

I think a more correct framework to analyze this phenomena is the free framework that Chris Anderson talks about in his article: &quot;Free! Why $0.00 Is the Future of Business&quot;.

Businesses are providing free, or collaborating to make money, not provide a social good. Likewise I would suggest most people blog to make money from ad words, even if this is not their primary motive. 
I think that where people or communities are providing information or websites of value businesses buy those and use them to make money. This is how Google built a business model. They then further that model by giving away free software like android to control the customer interaction. Open source software such as linux still has a long way to go to take on Microsoft and Windows because it&#039;s not very usable for your average mum and dad. Furthermore there is no incentive for the users of linux to develop a package that could  be sold to new computer buyers. If linux did start becoming popular then what would stop a corporate cashing in on it?

This doesn&#039;t sound like socialism to me, just a new way of undertaking good old fashioned capitalism. 

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brad,</p>
<p>I think Socialism is the wrong term for it&#8230; </p>
<p>In most people it provokes such a negative response that they won&#8217;t get the point Kevin is making.</p>
<p>I think a more correct framework to analyze this phenomena is the free framework that Chris Anderson talks about in his article: &#8220;Free! Why $0.00 Is the Future of Business&#8221;.</p>
<p>Businesses are providing free, or collaborating to make money, not provide a social good. Likewise I would suggest most people blog to make money from ad words, even if this is not their primary motive.<br />
I think that where people or communities are providing information or websites of value businesses buy those and use them to make money. This is how Google built a business model. They then further that model by giving away free software like android to control the customer interaction. Open source software such as linux still has a long way to go to take on Microsoft and Windows because it&#8217;s not very usable for your average mum and dad. Furthermore there is no incentive for the users of linux to develop a package that could  be sold to new computer buyers. If linux did start becoming popular then what would stop a corporate cashing in on it?</p>
<p>This doesn&#8217;t sound like socialism to me, just a new way of undertaking good old fashioned capitalism. </p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
